The dissertation contains more than one publishable argument. This is almost always true. It is also one of the most underappreciated facts about the relationship between doctoral research and scholarly publication. The authors who recognize it early, who begin thinking about the journal article while still finishing the dissertation or immediately after the defense, build publication records more efficiently than those who treat the dissertation and the article as separate projects, each requiring its own investment of time and energy.
Extraction takes more than cutting. The dissertation chapter and the journal article are different documents with different logics, different audiences, and different structural requirements, and cutting a chapter to article length without reconceiving its architecture produces a truncated chapter.
The reconception is the work, and understanding what it requires is what lets an author do it efficiently.
Identify the argument, not the chapter. The first step is to find the argument in the dissertation best suited to the target journal. Chapters often hold several. Some are central to the chapter's purpose and some are developed in support of it, and the article will typically be built around one of them: the one most fully developed in the existing material, most relevant to the target journal's scope, and most capable of standing independently of the dissertation's larger context.
Identify the target journal before drafting. Journals differ in scope, in methodological orientation, in expected article length, and in their conventions for literature engagement, citation style, and the structure of the argument. An article drafted without a specific journal in mind will need to be reshaped for every journal it is submitted to. Drafted for one journal, it is shaped correctly from the beginning. The shaping is faster, too, and cleaner.
The literature review problem. The dissertation literature review cannot be transferred to the journal article. Journal articles engage the existing literature selectively and efficiently, establishing the conversation the article is entering and the gap it addresses in two to four paragraphs where the dissertation took twenty to thirty pages. The author needs to pick out the sources in the dissertation literature review most directly relevant to the article's specific argument and build a focused literature engagement from those. The rest stays in the dissertation.
The methodology compression. Journal articles describe methodology concisely, with enough detail for the reader to evaluate the credibility of the findings and, in principle, to replicate the study. Compressing the methodology chapter to that scale means identifying the methodological decisions most consequential to the article's argument — the sampling approach, the data collection procedures, the analytical method — and presenting those with precision. The epistemological scaffolding and the extended justification for each decision belong in the dissertation. Leave them there.
The findings selection. Not all of the dissertation's findings belong in the article. The article presents the findings most directly relevant to the argument it is making, which may be one theme from a qualitative study, one set of results from a quantitative analysis, or one case from a multiple-case design. The selection is an argumentative act. The author is choosing which findings, presented in what order, make the strongest case for the article's central claim.
608-535-6324
editors@offthegridediting.com